[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Emacs build fail while bootstrapping (error in byte-compilation of veril

From: Aurélien Aptel
Subject: Emacs build fail while bootstrapping (error in byte-compilation of verilog-mode.el)
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 23:27:18 +0100


I can't compile master (7cc233e1e3):

$ find -iname '*.o' -delete
$ find -iname '*.elc' -delete
$ rm -rf config.status configure config.log *~ src/emacs src/temacs
$ ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make -j8 bootstrap
... long output...
In toplevel form:
progmodes/verilog-mode.el:3335:1:Error: Symbol’s function definition
is void: \,@
Makefile:268: recipe for target 'progmodes/verilog-mode.elc' failed
make[3]: *** [progmodes/verilog-mode.elc] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

In sql-end-of-statement:
progmodes/sql.el:2781:31:Warning: looking-back called with 1 argument, but
    requires 2-3
make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/knarf/prog/c/emacs/emacs/lisp'
Makefile:291: recipe for target 'compile-main' failed
make[2]: *** [compile-main] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/knarf/prog/c/emacs/emacs/lisp'
Makefile:381: recipe for target 'lisp' failed
make[1]: *** [lisp] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/knarf/prog/c/emacs/emacs'
Makefile:1087: recipe for target 'bootstrap' failed
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2

verilog-mode.el:3335 is empty but just before it there is this macro definition:

(defmacro verilog-save-scan-cache (&rest body)
  "Execute the BODY forms, allowing scan cache preservation within BODY.
This requires that insertions must use `verilog-insert'."
  ;; If the buffer is out of date, trash it, as we'll not check later the tick
  ;; Note this must work properly if there's multiple layers of calls
  ;; to verilog-save-scan-cache even with differing ticks.
     (unless (verilog-scan-cache-ok-p)   ; Must be before let
       (setq verilog-scan-cache-tick nil))
     (let* ((verilog-scan-cache-preserving (current-buffer)))
       (progn ,@body))))

If anyone has an idea...

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]