Re: Suggest: dont declare interactive-p obsolete

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> raman  <address@hidden> writes:

> This is a minor change -- that will let existing code run without warnings.
> If we turned the defun in subr.el to a defsubst and dropped the (declare
> (obsolete called-interactively-p "23.2")) (called-interactively-p
> 'interactive))

I don't see any downsides to this; others?

John