[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Suggest: dont declare interactive-p obsolete

From: Andreas Röhler
Subject: Re: Suggest: dont declare interactive-p obsolete
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:29:37 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4

 On 19.11.2015 14:46, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
On 11/19/2015 03:06 PM, Andreas Röhler wrote:

Instead of using this function, it is cleaner and more reliable to give
function an extra optional argument whose `interactive' spec specifies
non-nil unconditionally (\"p\" is a good way to do this), or via
\(not (or executing-kbd-macro noninteractive)).

You're just saying that neither the old, nor the new function should be used in most of the Lisp code. That may be true, but that doesn't say anything about whether the old name should be un-obsoleted.

That's not me saying this, that's the docstring of current implementation.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]