[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dynamic loading progress

From: Philipp Stephani
Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 00:08:44 +0000

Paul Eggert <address@hidden> schrieb am Sa., 21. Nov. 2015 um 00:29 Uhr:
Philipp Stephani wrote:
> why does it need to detect anything? Can't it just be a different
> function that doesn't signal, similar to push_handler and
> push_handler_nosignal?

Yes, that should work and should be easy to implement. But how would it behave
to the caller? Will the caller have to check that it doesn't return NULL? I hope
not; that would be a pain and error-prone.

Why, that's how malloc also behaves. 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]