[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lisp watchpoints

From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: Re: Lisp watchpoints
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:37:53 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux)

> It would signal in case of error right? Currently the code is ignoring
> bad watcher elements (including out of range integers), but perhaps
> it's actually better to signal an error.

It's marginally better to signal an error, I think.  But the difference
is not tremendously important.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]