[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Merging the xwidget branch

From: joakim
Subject: Re: Merging the xwidget branch
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:33:49 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> From: address@hidden
>> Cc: address@hidden
>> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:33:26 +0100
>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> > What's the status on this?  Is anything preventing the merge?
>> Status:
>> - I think it can be applied to master, but there are some known cosmetic
>>   issues that can be presumably fixed afterwards
> Right, this shouldn't hold us.


>> - Nobody likes the xwidget name, so there was a discussion regarding
>>   renaming the feature. It feels better changing the name before
>>   applying the patch to master(or wherever it's supposed to
>>   go). However, no consensus has been reached on a name yet.
> Let's leave this for later, I see no problem in mechanistic renaming.

Thats a relief if you say so.

>> - I would like some hand-holding during commiting of the patch, better
>>   yet if some trusted party could do it for me with hand holding from me
>>   instead
> What exactly are the problems you envision?

Well, none, except I didn't succeed very well last time.

>> - Some unforseen events have made me have less time than usual at the
>>   moment. 
> Will you be able to look into any problems that might come up after
> the merge?

Yes, I will have more time after the 17th.

Anyway, I'm not envisioning a merge as such, since the history isn't needed.

Joakim Verona

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]