Re: message-fetch-field vs require

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Stephen Leake <address@hidden> writes:

> I've got a function that uses message-fetch-field. The file has (require
> 'message). But the byte compiler still complains:
>
> bzr-gnus.el:155:1:Warning: the following functions might not be defined at
>     runtime: message-fetch-field, mm-save-part-to-file
>
> I've tried wrapping the require in "eval-and-compile"; no help.
>
> Can anyone explain what's going on?

No, sounds really odd to me.  `message-fetch-field' is a totally normal
function, so if you require `message' (and your load path points to the
version of message.el you're really using), then this shouldn't be
happening...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no