Re: [ELPA] programmer-dvorak input method

[Joakim Jalap]

John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:

>>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> >  . I rather think that input methods should all be bundled: they are
>>> >    too small to justify a separate package, and too basic to ask users
>>> >    to download them when they need them.
>>> 
>>> I'm not against that, provided they need little maintenance after having 
>>> been
>>> added. Does this mean created an "extra-inputs" project on ELPA, into which
>>> all these additions get added?
>
>> If that question was for me, I'm not sure I understand it.
>
> It was for you. So I'll just ask back: What were you suggesting the answer be
> to your point above?

If I may be so bold as to speak for Eli, what I _think_ he meant was
that input methods should be bundled with "core" Emacs, and not reside
in ELPA, since they impose no maintenance burden. And personally I think
that sounds good. :)

But I'm new to the game, so I leave it up to you guys to make the best
decision :)