[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Mac port
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Mac port |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Dec 2015 23:47:06 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 |
On 12/31/2015 11:36 PM, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
>
>> On Jan 1, 2016, at 15:54, Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> I probably shouldn't point this out, but Emacs on OS X already supports
>> invoking AppleScript. There's no GNU/Linux equivalent. Quelle horreur!
>
> That's an external mode for users to install.
No it isn't. Grep for ns-do-applescript.
>> Do you even care that your strategy hasn't been working?
>
> Emacs has been around longer than a huge amount of software and is bound to
> stay for a long time and outlive most of the editors that exist today. So
> it's hard to demonstrate that the "strategy" is not working. In fact, as was
> pointed earlier in this thread, a huge lot of Emacs users use it within OSX
> and *not* for it's ability to display emojis...
Let's talk about how keeping features out of GCC led to the total defeat
of Clang.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Daniel Colascione, 2016/01/01
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2016/01/01
- Re: Emacs Mac port,
Daniel Colascione <=
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Ingo Lohmar, 2016/01/01
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Bozhidar Batsov, 2016/01/01
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/01/02
- Re: Emacs Mac port, John Wiegley, 2016/01/02
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/01/03
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Bozhidar Batsov, 2016/01/03
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/01/03
- Re: Emacs Mac port, John Wiegley, 2016/01/03
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/01/04
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Chad Brown, 2016/01/04