RE: Please post older versions of GNU Emacs manuals on the web

[Drew Adams]

> >> In addition, I think the text about defadvice was deleted from the
> >> manual too soon. Just because it is no longer the recommended
> >> interface is no reason to remove it from the Lisp manual.
> >
> > OK, since there seems to be general agreement, how about we pull
> > defadvice back into the manual for 25.1, with a note that has been
> > deprecated.
> 
> That seems to make sense.  However, Raman stated that nadvice does not
> work for a number of use cases he currently uses defadvice for.  That
> hole needs to be filled in some manner eventually, or we will never be
> justified in completing deprecation.

+1

There is also the question of using defadvice to modify a
doc string.  AFAICT, that is another hole unfilled by nadvice.