[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc.

From: Daniel Colascione
Subject: Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc.
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 08:50:00 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0

On 01/03/2016 08:40 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>> From: Daniel Colascione <address@hidden>
>> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 07:49:44 -0800
>>> This is not a summary, this is propaganda.  If you cannot summarize an
>>> issue objectively, please don't summarize at all.  I deliberately
>>> avoided replying for fear of being too involved to write an objective
>>> summary.  I wish you exercised the same self-restraint.
>>> John, please disregard this "summary".
>> Nice trick, shutting down discussion so that the code stays by default.
> I didn't shut down any discussion.  You are free to continue writing,
> on this subject as on any other.
>> I see nothing wrong with advocacy.
> Neither do I.  Just don't submit advocacy as a "summary" when a
> decision-maker requests one in order to make up his/her mind.

I presented your argument (such as it is), then presented mine. If you
don't feel as though I've adequately presented your position, you can

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]