[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Jan 2016 04:49:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Drew Adams <address@hidden> writes:
[snip]
>> Maintaining all this information on an external resource is
>> unmanageable, it simply wont work.
>
> Why not?
Do I need to explain the difficulties of maintaining information about
the characteristics of a resource outside of where the resource is
defined?
[snip]
>> For reading the annotations (and, possibly, for performance reasons,
>> applying the filter) modifications are required on some Emacs
>> infrastructure.
>
> Why? What's wrong with `(get SYMBOL 'applies-to-foo-mode)'?
The filtering, on its most simplified implementation, would gather the
commands which are declared to be related to any active (major|minor)
mode on the current buffer, plus the commands that are not related to
any mode. Without a perceptible delay by the user. As an Emacs session
can reach tens of thousands of available commands, my guess is that some
new infrastructure (possibly at the C level) is required.
- Re: 4K Bugs, (continued)
- Re: 4K Bugs, Stefan Monnier, 2016/01/08
- Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx (was: 4K Bugs), Óscar Fuentes, 2016/01/08
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, John Wiegley, 2016/01/08
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/01/08
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, John Wiegley, 2016/01/08
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Spencer Boucher, 2016/01/08
- RE: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Drew Adams, 2016/01/08
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/01/08
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/01/08
- RE: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Drew Adams, 2016/01/08
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Stefan Monnier, 2016/01/08
- RE: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Drew Adams, 2016/01/08
- RE: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Drew Adams, 2016/01/08
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/01/08
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Yuri Khan, 2016/01/09
- RE: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Drew Adams, 2016/01/09
- Making `interactive' conditional (was: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx), John Wiegley, 2016/01/09
- RE: Making `interactive' conditional (was: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx), Drew Adams, 2016/01/09
- RE: Making `interactive' conditional (was: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx), Drew Adams, 2016/01/11
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/01/10