[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: tags-loop-continue

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: tags-loop-continue
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 21:01:35 +0200

> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 21:19:27 +0300
> >> On the flip side, the users may get confused that M-, is bound to
> >> different commands in different contexts.
> >
> > But the current binding of M-, makes no sense while tags-search is
> > on-going, I think.  So it sounds like a good compromise to me.
> I suppose. My main concern is that someone can get used to M-, being 
> bound to tags-loop-continue, and then use this key combination outside 
> of tags-search, to an entirely different result.

Could be, but I think it's a lower probability than someone using it
as part of tags-search.  So doing this is progress, I think.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]