[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Making `interactive' conditional
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Making `interactive' conditional |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Jan 2016 22:46:18 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
I think it is a bad idea to make the interactive nature of a command
conditional. If the user types a command's name after M-x,
it should always call the command.
I think it is reasonable to omit commands from M-x's completion,
but refusing to run them is going to far in imposing on the user.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, (continued)
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/01/08
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Yuri Khan, 2016/01/09
- RE: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Drew Adams, 2016/01/09
- Making `interactive' conditional (was: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx), John Wiegley, 2016/01/09
- RE: Making `interactive' conditional (was: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx), Drew Adams, 2016/01/09
- RE: Making `interactive' conditional (was: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx), Drew Adams, 2016/01/11
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/01/10
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/01/10
- RE: Making `interactive' conditional, Drew Adams, 2016/01/10
- Message not available
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Artur Malabarba, 2016/01/10
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/01/11
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Stefan Monnier, 2016/01/11
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/01/11
- RE: Making `interactive' conditional, Herring, Davis, 2016/01/11
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/01/11
- RE: Making `interactive' conditional, Herring, Davis, 2016/01/11
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/01/11
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/01/11
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/01/11
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional (was: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/01/10