[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Making `interactive' conditional

From: John Wiegley
Subject: Re: Making `interactive' conditional
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:20:37 -0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin)

>>>>> Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:

>> I'd still love to see a faster, more apropos M-x develop in ELPA, if anyone
>> is interested in making that happen.

> As Lars said, instrumentalization is required.

A demonstrative implementation of this feature can be done without
instrumentation. Instrumentation is the "right" way, but is not a necessary
way. We shouldn't think core needs to be changed before we can try out a
fancier M-x.

I'm not against a smarter M-x; I'd like to use it for the same reasons others
have stated (my own completion list right now is massive, slow, and at times,
confusingly over-populated).

John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]