[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: member inconsistency?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: member inconsistency? |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jan 2016 18:58:24 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > In contrast, `member' (and `memql' in the float case) has no check and
> > also uses a for-loop with the condition CONSP (tail), and when this
> > fails, the function just returns Qnil.
> `delete' and `delq' also has the bug.
Why consider it a bug? What is wrong with it?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: member inconsistency?, (continued)
- Re: member inconsistency?, Andreas Schwab, 2016/01/28
- Re: member inconsistency?, Stephen Berman, 2016/01/28
- Re: member inconsistency?, Johan Bockgård, 2016/01/28
- Re: member inconsistency?, Stephen Berman, 2016/01/28
- Re: member inconsistency?, Andreas Schwab, 2016/01/29
- Re: member inconsistency?, Stephen Berman, 2016/01/29
- Re: member inconsistency?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/29
- Re: member inconsistency?, John Wiegley, 2016/01/29
- Re: member inconsistency?,
Richard Stallman <=