[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BuGit
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
Re: BuGit |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 22:30:09 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/44.0 |
On 02/02/2016 06:09 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
https://gitlab.com/monnier/bugit
It's still primitive (only the command-line UI and the email
notification system are more or less complete: the web UI is still
read-only, and there is no email UI at all).
Looks like an interesting experiment.
These lines look a bit contradictory to me:
> ...the user can also share the same repository with the main project.
> Every issue lives in its own branch named bugit/<id>.
I imagine it might be uncomfortable working on a project which contains
thousands of branches. You do a pull--and Git shows you all the remotes
that have changed. With lots of branches, that would be a lot of output,
even if you don't check them out locally.
Not sure if there's an option to ignore only certain branches, for
certain commands.
- BuGit, Stefan Monnier, 2016/02/02
- Re: BuGit, Nicolas Petton, 2016/02/02
- Re: BuGit, Aaron Conole, 2016/02/02
- Re: BuGit,
Dmitry Gutov <=
- Re: BuGit, Aurélien Aptel, 2016/02/03