[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Initial documentation for xwidgets
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Initial documentation for xwidgets |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:25:39 +0200 |
> From: address@hidden
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 22:08:03 +0100
>
> I finally read the documentation you wrote for xwidgets, and it was really
> good thanks!
Are you sure? I cannot imagine I was that lucky. There are some
functions I didn't document, some of them in xwidget.c, others in
xwidget.el -- did I decide correctly which ones should be documented
and which shouldn't?
> I have just two things.
>
> - This fixme, I dont really have a good answer.
> @c FIXME: What else can a URI specify in this context?
> The uri is just any ury webkit accepts, which isnt a very helpful
> explanation of course.
Examples could help. Can you provide examples of URIs that are
neither URLs nor file names?
> - When I read the documentation I noticed the term 'webkit-osr'. -osr
> stands for 'off screen rendering'.
>
> There used to be different types of widgets, that weren't rendered
> off-screen. I don't think I will re-introduce those widgets because they
> were unreliable.
>
> So, there will likely only ever be osr widgets, which makes the osr suffix
> redundant.
>
> I guess people might have started tinkering with xwidget-osr.
>
> What do you think, should I change this, or does it not matter?
We can still change it, it's not too late.
Thanks.