Re: On language-dependent defaults for character-folding

[Óscar Fuentes]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>   > What I find flabbergasting is the insistence on ignoring the "some
>   > cases will be regarded as glaring bugs" part.
>
> Might that depend on what we say the feature is supposed to do?

I'm disputing its default status, not the feature itself. Apparently,
some people here think that the feature should be enabled by default. A
search mechanism that matches unrelated letters, no less!