[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Human-readable file sorting
From: |
Pierpaolo Bernardi |
Subject: |
Re: Human-readable file sorting |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Feb 2016 16:35:42 +0100 |
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> Please don't call that function `file-string-lessp', or anything that
> has "file" in it. This sorting order has nothing to do with files.
> Names I can suggest include "logical", "intuitive", and "numerical".
The established name is "natural sort". There's no reason to invent a new one?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_sort_order
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, (continued)
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Alexis, 2016/02/20
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/20
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/20
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Alexis, 2016/02/21
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/21
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Yuri Khan, 2016/02/21
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/21
- Re: Human-readable file sorting,
Pierpaolo Bernardi <=
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/20
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Richard Stallman, 2016/02/21
- RE: Human-readable file sorting, Herring, Davis, 2016/02/20
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Paul Eggert, 2016/02/20
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/20
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Richard Stallman, 2016/02/21
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Stefan Monnier, 2016/02/20
Re: Human-readable file sorting, Richard Stallman, 2016/02/20