[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 b6d6304: Comment on last change to define-der

From: Leo Liu
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 b6d6304: Comment on last change to define-derived-mode
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 09:36:13 +0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.91 (OS X 10.11.3)

On 2016-03-01 09:24 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> That should at least give one example where adding (indent 3) hurts.

define-derived-mode is available since at least emacs 22.1 without any
(indent N) settings. I think maybe it is better to think in the other
direction that is what does (indent 3) bring to the table? is it worth
breaking 10 years of practice? Personally I have code that looks like

 (define-derived-mode lcnt-mode special-mode nil :abbrev-table nil

If you insist I'll append that example to the comment.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]