[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 b6d6304: Comment on last change to define-der

From: Leo Liu
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 b6d6304: Comment on last change to define-derived-mode
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 10:09:49 +0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (OS X 10.11.3)

On 2016-03-04 18:10 +0200, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> In this case, though, maybe we should revert the revert, all things
> considered.

I love to hear the `all things' that you have considered? Make a trivial
change is trivial but I would like to know we have enough justification
to change something that people have grown dependent in the past 10
years. Care to elaborate?

I am tired of people claiming representing 90ish% users when there is
only just one or two (at most a handful) disregard the silent majority.

No users will come and praise how good some feature is. What we know is
nobody has complaint anything in the past 10 years. This is hard


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]