Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters

[Philipp Stephani]

Marcin Borkowski <address@hidden> schrieb am Sa., 5. März 2016 um 16:40 Uhr:

On 2016-03-05, at 16:28, Philipp Stephani <address@hidden> wrote:

> We should probably do whatever Perl does

This is a slippery slope.

(SCNR;-).)

Best,

Yes, and I certainly wouldn't introduce e.g. custom aliases (given the lack of reader macros such a change would be very unconventional). I'd vote for implementing "full" support and some of the aspects of "loose" support, as suggested by Paul.