[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Should we restore manually maintained ChangeLogs

From: Andreas Schwab
Subject: Re: Should we restore manually maintained ChangeLogs
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:43:57 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux)

Nikolaus Rath <address@hidden> writes:

> On Mar 09 2016, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Maybe we should move to a version control system which permits commit
>>> messages to be amended.  (Only half joking.)
>> These seem to be in rather short supply, sadly.  Any suggestion?
> Mercurial with the "evolve" extension implements non-destructive history
> editing. In short, commits can have metadata that marks them as
> "superseding" a previous commit. Both superseded and new commit remain
> part of the repository, but most commands be default work on the
> superseding commit.

Like git replace.


Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]