Re: Arbitrary function: find the number(s) of expected arguments

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:16:55 +0000
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
>  > We are discussing for which cases it can be implemented. It can be 
> implemented and would be
>  useful for a
>  > wide range of functions, such as those defined with defun. It cannot be 
> implemented for functions like
>  g; that's
>  > just a limitation we have to live with.
> 
>  That's one possibility. Another is that the implementation will be
>  able to find out the truth, just like the Lisp interpreter does.
> 
> Presumably that would imply solving the halting problem. 

I guess we'll have to disagree about that.