[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thinking about changed buffers

From: Clément Pit--Claudel
Subject: Re: Thinking about changed buffers
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 01:20:29 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0

On 04/04/2016 12:44 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> C-u C-x C-w C-j
> IMO, those sequences are above of the threshold of what can be
> considered convenient

Agreed :) What about a setting that would make C-x C-s always save, regardless 
of whether saving is actually needed?

Also, I'd argue that it's almost a bug that you get a overwriting warning using 
C-x C-w when you're writing to a patch equal to buffer-file-name. Isn't it?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]