Re: M-x send-emacs-patch

[Clément Pit--Claudel]

On 2016-05-05 17:20, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> Actually releasing your changes in the public domain in the way
> accepted by FSF will require paperwork anyway, so you must have a
> very particular reason to choose this route.

Is this the case? 
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/doc/Copyright/conditions.text 
says the following:

    * Public domain.

    If you put the program in the public domain, we prefer to have a signed
    piece of paper--a disclaimer of rights--from you confirming this.  If the
    program is not very important, we can do without one; the worst that could
    happen is that we might some day be forced to stop using it.

Clément.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature