Re: C and Emacs Lisp code parts

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Andreas Röhler <address@hidden> writes:

> You need a number to believe function running from Emacs Lisp is slower than
> an implementation in C?

Performance and efficiency have many dimensions. Switching out a bus for a
race car might could mean very little if your map is bad.

We've put out the call for a performance czar before, but thus far no takers.
It's an area where much help is needed, and could be an interesting puzzle to
take on.

-- 
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature