[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs? |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Jul 2016 18:36:38 +0300 |
> From: Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 10:20:07 -0400
>
> Currently, I think ChangeLogs are a barrier to contribution. The vast
> majority of other software projects don't use them.
We don't have ChangeLogs anymore. So I'm not sure what is this about,
please clarify.
> So I would suggest moving to a pull request system, where code review
> from a second contributor is required to merge any non-trivial code
> (exceptions should be granted based on years contributing to Emacs).
> That also gives *everyone* the opportunity to comment on the code before
> it's merged, instead of post-facto. Clearly services such as Github and
> BitBucket and many others have been offering this functionality for a
> while with good results.
Everyone can comment on patches now, but almost no one does. How can
we be sure this arrangement will work? It could be a tremendous
impediment to development if everyone must wait for comments that
never come.
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/07/06
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Robert Weiner, 2016/07/06
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/07/06
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/06
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/07/06
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/06
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/06
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/06
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/06
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/06
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, John Wiegley, 2016/07/06
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/07/06