|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | vc-region-history, was: Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs? |
Date: | Sat, 9 Jul 2016 02:39:01 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:47.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/47.0 |
On 07/09/2016 02:29 AM, John Wiegley wrote:
Personally, I've never found vc-region-history too useful (as opposed to e.g. vc-annotate).Aren't they quite different? vc-annotate shows me the last time any line was modified, while vc-region-history show me the history of that region, including all the times it was modified.
Yes, but both are tools that can be used for examining how a given piece of code changed over time and why.
Inside vc-annotate buffer, I use vc-annotate-revision-previous-to-line a lot (bound to `a').
vc-region-history, on the other hand, gives a narrow view of each changeset (but the full commit messages, which is understandable, but can be confusing), and it seems basically impossible for it to correctly follow the history of a given piece of code, as long as its complex enough.
Granted, I've only ever tried it out in complex cases so far.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |