[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: systemd @ in filenames not supported by thing-at-point
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: systemd @ in filenames not supported by thing-at-point |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jul 2016 07:45:29 -0700 (PDT) |
> > Is it a how-do-I-do-this question or
> > a question about Emacs development?
>
> Is it life in general, or computers, that are binary?
If you are not strictly just-black-or-white-with-no-gray you
will understand that summary question, especially following
the more detailed explanation, as really asking:
"Is it MORE a how-do-I-do-this question or MORE a question
about Emacs development?"
It's a judgment call, and yes, it's your call - you choose.
You might sometimes have difficulty deciding - things are
not always only black-or-white, but please make a choice,
as opposed to cross-posting.
- systemd @ in filenames not supported by thing-at-point, Emanuel Berg, 2016/07/29
- RE: systemd @ in filenames not supported by thing-at-point, Drew Adams, 2016/07/30
- Re: systemd @ in filenames not supported by thing-at-point, Emanuel Berg, 2016/07/30
- RE: systemd @ in filenames not supported by thing-at-point, Drew Adams, 2016/07/30
- Re: systemd @ in filenames not supported by thing-at-point, Emanuel Berg, 2016/07/30
- RE: systemd @ in filenames not supported by thing-at-point,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: systemd @ in filenames not supported by thing-at-point, Emanuel Berg, 2016/07/30
- Re: systemd @ in filenames not supported by thing-at-point, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/30
- Re: systemd @ in filenames not supported by thing-at-point, Emanuel Berg, 2016/07/30
- Re: systemd @ in filenames not supported by thing-at-point, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/30