[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Jul 2016 22:08:33 +0300 |
> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 21:52:04 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 21:11:32 +0300
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> > Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> >
> > > The del_range_byte call which I caught with gdb last night was, I think,
> > > the one at fileio.c L4037. I don't know the code well enough to say
> > > that that's the only one which might trigger.
> >
> > If changing that one alone solves the problem, we don't need to
> > consider any others.
>
> Actually, I think we need to change all 3 of those calls, since they
> all handle the same situation, with minor differences.
Of course, I still think we should try solving this in CC Mode alone,
if reasonably possible.
- Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/07/31
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Noam Postavsky, 2016/07/31
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/31
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/31
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/31
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/31
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/07/31
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/31