[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2)
From: |
Richard Copley |
Subject: |
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Aug 2016 11:37:09 +0100 |
On 2 August 2016 at 11:15, Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> wrote:
> It's my emotional reaction to a dodgy coding practice. We have two
> functions, one of which assumes far too much about the inner workings of
> the other. This "convolution" (as Richard Copley described it) is
> liable to lead to all sorts of tangles and awkwardnesses and things
> generally being very difficult to maintain.
:) I think that was Eli.
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), (continued)
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Richard Stallman, 2016/08/01
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/08/08
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/08
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/08/08