[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Remove unused variable `command-debug-status'

From: Alexey Veretennikov
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove unused variable `command-debug-status'
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:01:37 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.91 (darwin)


Philippe has signed papers and it is confirmed by JohnW.

Philippe Vaucher <address@hidden> writes:

>  I already did the copyright assignment dance and it was accepted &
>  sent to me the 2016-09-07, do I need to send the confirmation to
>  someone in order to post here?
>  When I sent my first patch, I asked the person who helped commit that to 
> look up my name in the
>  list of people who have assigned their copyright. 
> Well, I had to do copyright assignements for ztree, but that was on github
> (https://github.com/fourier/ztree/pull/33). Maybe @fourier will recognize 
> himself and warrant me then :-)
> (I'm Silex).
>  The patches should be sent as bug reports. That way, the patch and the 
> reasoning behind it stays
>  together in a clean bug thread. Also the commit to master can then refer to 
> that (Bug#NNNNN). So,
>  no guesswork is involved if someone wants to understand why a particular 
> commit was made. 
> Oh, I did that in the past but I thought that was meant for general bug 
> reporting. Do messages sent to
> address@hidden also end on emacs-devel? For information, messages like
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2016-09/msg00635.html don't 
> seem to follow this "patches
> as bug reports" philosophy.
> Anyway, I found on https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/email-clients.txt 
> that GMail's UI is not
> good to send inline patches, so I'll send them to address@hidden as 
> attachment instead (that
> or setup another client).
> Thanks!
> Philippe


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]