[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2016 06:06:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 26.0.50.1 |
On 2016-10-10, at 15:56, Georges Ko <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Are you familiar with the names package?
>
> It looks exactly what I had in mind :). Thanks!
Be sure to check out also the nameless package by the same author!
> Georges
BTW, someone (Raman?) on this thread said that namespaces save typing.
That's not exactly right; that goal is achieved with autocompletion (as
he already noticed). What namespaces really do is twofold:
1. Help avoid collisions, and
2. (last but not least!) save on reading.
Long function names are really bad.
Elisp is not Java.
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/16
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Georges Ko, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Georges Ko, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Marcin Borkowski <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, raman, 2016/10/10
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Kelvin White, 2016/10/07
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Søren Pilgård, 2016/10/07