[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added

From: Phillip Lord
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:40:53 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux)

John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:

>>>>>> "PL" == Phillip Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> PL> All makes sense, but still a bit confused about how we would decide
> PL> whether a package would be tarball or core. What would the criteria be?
> Whatever the developers here decide. Someone will propose that a package be
> included, and we'll agree or disagree on each point.

That doesn't really answer the question:-)

I'm wondering on what basis we would make the distinction between core
and tarball. Potential usefulness, longevity, quality etc?

I'm not asking because I expect to have completely clear criteria at
this stage, but because I want to know that there are some criteria. If
there are not, then we may be making an unnecessary distinction.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]