[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concurrency, again
From: |
Michael Albinus |
Subject: |
Re: Concurrency, again |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Oct 2016 09:16:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm also not sure if Tramp would be asynchronous when a Tramp method
> used just core functions, no process.
There are Tramp methods like "scp", which use already a second
asynchronous process for copying files internally. This could be exposed
to the user easily, once we have an asynchronous `copy-file-*'
interface.
> Ted
Best regards, Michael.
- Re: Concurrency, again, (continued)
- Re: Concurrency, again, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/13
- Re: Concurrency, again, John Wiegley, 2016/10/13
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/10/14
- Re: Concurrency, again, Michael Albinus, 2016/10/14
- Re: Concurrency, again, John Wiegley, 2016/10/14
- Re: Concurrency, again, John Wiegley, 2016/10/14
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/10/14
- Re: Concurrency, again,
Michael Albinus <=
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/10/17
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ken Raeburn, 2016/10/17
- Re: Concurrency, again, Stefan Monnier, 2016/10/17
- Re: Concurrency, again, Stefan Huchler, 2016/10/14
- Re: Concurrency, again, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/17
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/17
- Re: Concurrency, again, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/17
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/17
- Re: Concurrency, again, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/17
- Re: Concurrency, again, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/10/17