Re: Concurrency, again

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:34:18 +0200
> Cc: address@hidden
> 
> I'm assuming you're referring to eww, and it sure does need concurrency.
> Computing complicated layouts can be slow, and it would be nice if it
> could take without stopping the user from doing other things.

It could start by only doing layout of the visible portion, and doing
the rest from an idle timer.  Or does it already do that?