Re: feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added

[Michael Albinus]

address@hidden (Phillip Lord) writes:

> The in tree solution, conversely, requires copying files into lisp/,
> adding more non-source files into this tree in an in-directory source
> build of emacs. And, as Lars described nicely, also requires generation
> of manifests, and changes to the load-path mechanism in C.

Packages carry also other files, like *.texi. Your proposal does not
handle this. And copying them to doc/misc, as one would expect, breaks
your philosophy to have them all-in-one-subdirectory-below-lisp/.

The current elpa approach does not handle this problem either, but
that's another problem.

> Phil

Best regards, Michael.