[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again) |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:45:59 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> No in theory, mostly yes in practice so far. Although Wayland is
> intended to be portable among Unix-like systems, it's currently mostly
> limited to the Linux kernel because its reference implementation is
> being developed on GNU/Linux.
Do you think there is a great difficulty in making other kernels
(BSD, Hurd) support Wayland?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), (continued)
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Richard Stallman, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Philippe Vaucher, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/21
- Tookits (was Re: Emacs as browser), Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/21
- Re: Tookits (was Re: Emacs as browser), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/21
- Re: Tookits (was Re: Emacs as browser), Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/21
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Richard Stallman, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Paul Eggert, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/20
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, joakim, 2016/10/12
- Re: Concurrency, again, John Wiegley, 2016/10/12
- Re: Concurrency, again, SAKURAI Masashi, 2016/10/15
- Re: Concurrency, again, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/17
- Re: Concurrency, again, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/17
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/18
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ken Raeburn, 2016/10/18
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/18