[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Concurrency, again

From: Philipp Stephani
Subject: Re: Concurrency, again
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:28:51 +0000

John Wiegley <address@hidden> schrieb am Di., 25. Okt. 2016 um 23:46 Uhr:
>>>>> "PS" == Philipp Stephani <address@hidden> writes:

>> Are you willing to invest much time in implementing your solution?

PS> I think this is important, so I'd be willing to spend some significant
PS> amount of time on it. If it turns out to be a huge time sink, we'd still
PS> have the existing concurrency branch, so we wouldn't be worse off than we
PS> are now.

This sounds great, Philipp, I look forward to your experiment.

I've pushed the experimental branch to 'concurrency-libtask'. It's essentially a simple wrapper around libtask, which implements CSP based on setcontext. I've also implemented a Windows equivalent based on Windows native fibers, but haven't tried that yet. 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]