[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: When should ralloc.c be used?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: When should ralloc.c be used? |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:39:08 +0300 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:13:19 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> I just did 'time temacs -batch -l loadup'. It took over 18 seconds.
> We have a long way to go to make that fast enough.
Try the patch I pointed to in a previous message, and see what kind of
speedup is possible by 2 simple measures.
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358), (continued)
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/28
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/26
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358), Richard Stallman, 2016/10/26
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/10/28
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/28
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/10/28
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/29
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/29
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/29
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/30
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Alp Aker, 2016/10/30
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/30
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/30
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358), Richard Stallman, 2016/10/24
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/25
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358), Richard Stallman, 2016/10/26
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358), Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/25