|
From: | Tino Calancha |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Implement letrec without backquote? |
Date: | Sat, 5 Nov 2016 20:24:28 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: | Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) |
On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Nov 05 2016, Tino Calancha <address@hidden> wrote:Also, i wanted to expand in just one setq call, that is, instead of (setq x 1) (setq y 2) ... (setq foo N) like this: (setq x 1 y 2 ... foo N) But, it seems it's doesn't bring a better efficiency.That's because setq is a bytecode primitive, and both variants are compiled to the same byte code. Andreas.
Thank you! I was quite puzzle with that behaviour.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |