[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Nov 2016 17:31:38 +0200 |
> From: address@hidden (Phillip Lord)
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 14:52:44 +0000
>
> Can I suggest we add 9x, and Windows XP into the list for Emacs-26?
My main development machine runs Windows XP, so if you want to drop
support for it, you should ask me to resign first.
Btw, there are 2 versions of Windows between 9X and XP, which we still
support, and you didn't mention.
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, (continued)
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/08
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/08
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/09
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/09
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/09
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/10
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, martin rudalics, 2016/11/09
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/15
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/07