[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lldb support
From: |
Stefan Huchler |
Subject: |
Re: lldb support |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Nov 2016 02:02:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Sam Steingold <address@hidden> writes:
> What is wrong with replacing a GNU package with a non-GNU
> package which is free software?
>
> How is it a loss for GNU?
>
> It seems that if there is a better free debugger than gdb, GNU can
> switch the resources currently devoted to gdb to another project.
I think Free is != free, bsd != gpl.
One is copyleft the other not. Or like MS would call it the one is viral
the other not.
- Re: lldb support, (continued)
- Re: lldb support, Philippe Vaucher, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/14
- Re: lldb support, Joseph Mingrone, 2016/11/15
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/16
- Re: lldb support, Sam Steingold, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support,
Stefan Huchler <=
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/10