[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spending time on Guile Emacs?
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: Spending time on Guile Emacs? |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:24:20 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, Nov 30 2016, John Wiegley wrote:
>>>>>> "TG" == Tobias Gerdin <address@hidden> writes:
>
> TG> So I am wondering if the time used to play catch-up with modern Lisps
> TG> would not be better spent by integrating Guile?
>
> I really think this just comes to down to who is willing to do that work?
> Guilemacs has made a lot of progress in the last few years, but it still
> hasn't garnered much attention yet.
Did we ever address the mismatch between Guile strings and Emacs ones?
We can't depend on everything being valid UTF-8.
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, (continued)
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/30
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/30
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/29
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Philipp Stephani, 2016/11/29
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/29
Preview: portable dumper, Tobias Gerdin, 2016/11/30
Re: Preview: portable dumper, Reini Urban, 2016/11/30