[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file

From: Clément Pit--Claudel
Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:28:22 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1

On 2016-12-16 09:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Cc: address@hidden
>> From: Clément Pit--Claudel <address@hidden>
>> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:28:37 -0500
>>> Autoloading should fix that.  This idea won't work anyway without
>>> adding the relevant symbols to loaddefs.el.
>> Indeed; but then we need to autoload all functions in these files, right?
> Not sure about "all", but most of them, yes.  And variables.
>> Also, does autoloading work for macros?
> It doesn't, but why would macros be a problem?  They need to be seen
> by the byte compiler when it compiles the package, not when the
> package is loaded.

Right; but won't we have a problem when package.el compiles newly downloaded 
packages that depend on formerly autoloaded libraries?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]