[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Dec 2016 13:54:27 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> First forward run Backwards Second forward run
> master: 34.100s 36.050s 34.575s
> comment-cache: 30.110s 32.275s 34.990s
Judging by those figures, it seems to be a rather small improvement.
Is it worth adding complexity to get a 13% speedup in one operation?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, (continued)
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Paul Eggert, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/25
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/25
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/27
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/28
Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch,
Richard Stallman <=