Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:19:12 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> >> > The line number in the error message is bogus, it points to a require
> >> > line (that's a known issue with byte-compiler error reporting, I
> >> > think).
> >> 
> >> It's not bogus, since the error was raised while the byte-compiler
> >> evaluated the form there.
> >
> > It's "bogus" in the sense that it isn't useful for finding the code
> > which triggered the error.
> 
> It is as bogus as every Lisp error.

On the contrary: most of them provide useful information about the
error locus.  This one clearly didn't.