[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CEDET Merge

From: Stephen Leake
Subject: Re: CEDET Merge
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:25:47 -0600
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (windows-nt)

David Engster <address@hidden> writes:

> Stephen Leake writes:
>> Edward John Steere <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> I understand that you've changed your merge strategy, so please tell
>>>> if/when this becomes relevant again.
>>>> Thanks for working on this.
>>> Correct.  Thanks for your input anyway.  Hopefully it wont take too long
>>> before I have something to show for my efforts.
>> I'd like to help with this. Perhaps doing some of the merge work, or by
>> running tests; let me know.
> Actually, there's one thing which really didn't get much attention
> during all those years: the texi files. I'm not sure how much those
> diverged between Emacs and CEDET upstream. It was always messy, since in
> the initial merge not all docs were imported from upstream. So if you'd
> like to take a look at the texi files, that'd be much appreciated.

Ok, I'll look at the texi files currently in SourceForge and Emacs
CEDET, and make recommendations.

-- Stephe

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]